FAQ’s for Medical Malpractice
Are nursing home cases considered malpractice?
Can a case be reopened after it is settled?
Can I sue my doctor for releasing my records to my employer?
Can you file malpractice against someone other than a doctor?
Can you sue for what might have happened?
Do most cases go to trial?
How can I afford to hire an attorney to represent me?
How can I find out if a doctor has been previously sued for malpractice?
Is a misdiagnosis malpractice?
Is there a minimum or maximum amount that can be recovered?
What does “preponderance of evidence” mean?
What expenses are generally paid by a settlement for a malpractice case?
What is a normal settlement amount?
What is “contributory negligence”?
What is “informed consent?”
What is “subrogation”?
What’s the medical malpractice “standard of care”?
When should I settle my case?
Why do I have to have an expert establish that I was harmed?
Are nursing home cases considered malpractice?
Possibly. It depends on what was done or not done. Many states have adopted special procedures and remedies for nursing home issues, and even adopted a special “bill of rights” for nursing home residents.
Back to top
Can a case be reopened after it is settled?
Generally, no. Whenever you settle a case, you generally sign a release that would forever keep you from pursuing the claim again.
Back to top
Can I sue my doctor for releasing my records to my employer?
Possibly. Many employers can legally review their employees’ medical records covered by the company’s health plan, which sometimes includes hospital records and previous worker’s compensation claims.
Back to top
Can you file malpractice against someone other than a doctor?
A medical malpractice suit can be lodged against any individual or entity who provides health care. This would include, for example, doctors, nurses, technicians, physical therapists and optometrists.
Back to top
Can you sue for what might have happened?
While it is distressing to learn that a medical procedure may have resulted in a very undesirable outcome such as permanent injury or even death, it’s not generally feasible to sue for what “might” have happened, particularly if there was not any negligence.
Back to top
Do most cases go to trial?
Malpractice claims tend to be a fight to the death and are settled less often than most other cases, which also means they can take more time and rack up more expenses.
Back to top
How can I afford to hire an attorney to represent me?
Most law firms will accept medical malpractice cases on a contingency fee basis. That means you don’t have to pay attorney fees unless the case is settled favorably. You generally do have to pay expenses associated with your case, regardless of whether you win or lose.
Back to top
How can I find out if a doctor has been previously sued for malpractice?
Check with your state medical licensing board to see if they have, and will release, information on the doctor.
Back to top
Is a misdiagnosis malpractice?
Not necessarily. Medicine is not an exact science and errors in diagnosis can be made. Law does not require doctors to be right all the time but rather that their actions meet the standard of care set out by state statutes, as well as what a reasonable doctor would do in the same situation.
Back to top
Is there a minimum or maximum amount that can be recovered?
No. This depends on injury and extent of damages. There are no parameters, unless dictated by state statute.
Back to top
What does “preponderance of evidence” mean?
Preponderance of evidence is evidence that is more convincing than the evidence that is offered in opposition. It is whatever is more probable than not or has a greater weight.
Back to top
What expenses are generally paid by a settlement for a malpractice case?
Generally, state statutes control what a malpractice settlement takes into consideration. The following are commonly covered:
Past, present and future medical expenses for treatment of the injury caused by the medical malpractice
Other financial damages and economic damages that the malpractice caused
Compensation for pain and suffering
Back to top
What is a normal settlement amount?
There is no normal or set amount in recovering damages from medical malpractice. Every case and injury is different. There are many nuances that determine a reasonable settlement amount, such as:
Impact the injury has on earning capacity
Impact the injury has on life functions
How the jury perceives the injured party
The atmosphere in the geographic area concerning medical malpractice
Only an attorney can give you an idea of what type of settlement you might be entitled to.
Back to top
What is “contributory negligence”?
Contributory negligence is an injured person’s failure to exercise due care, which contributed to the injury. One example of contributory negligence in a failure-to-diagnose case would be if a doctor recommends that the patient undergo a screening exam for cancer and the patient neglects to follow through with the doctor’s instructions, only to be diagnosed with cancer later.
Back to top
What is “informed consent?”
When a doctor is going to perform a procedure, he or she is required to advise the patient of the procedure that is going to be performed as well as all the possible consequences. This is referred to as “informed consent.” If the doctor doesn’t do this, it might lead to a medical malpractice case. There are some instances where a doctor isn’t required to obtain an informed consent, such as a case where the patient is unconscious, a family member can’t be reached in an emergency or if there isn’t a living will.
Back to top
What is “subrogation”?
Subrogation is a legal concept that allows someone who covers the cost of your injuries, generally an insurance company, to eventually recover those payments from the person determined legally liable for your injury.
Back to top
What’s the medical malpractice “standard of care”?
While state law generally determines how negligence is defined, the “standard of care” is generally defined by the medical community. It’s not the measure of what is optimum care or even the measure of what an expert thinks should have been done in hindsight. The issue is whether any reasonable physician could have done what the doctor in question did, based on the available information. Help defining “acceptable practice” can come from a medical expert’s experience, medical texts, literature and publications from groups such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. However, in most cases the standard of care the doctor deviated from must be established at trial by expert testimony.
Back to top
When should I settle my case?
If you receive a settlement offer, you should consider it with the advice and guidance of your attorney.
Back to top
Why do I have to have an expert establish that I was harmed?
In order to prevail in a medical malpractice case, you must prove that the standard of care wasn’t followed. The courts have come to recognize experts with experience, training and an understanding of the level of care associated with a particular medical procedure as being able to attest to or gauge the standard of care provided.